igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary

From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 01:21:16 GMT-3

• Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: BGP regular exp [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Cisco Net: "Re: Auto RP with sparse mode and listner will fall in to dense"
• Next in thread: Tiean: "Re: igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary"
• Maybe reply: Tiean: "Re: igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

what is the functional difference between:
ip igmp access-group 1
and
ip multicast-boundary 1.....

both seem to stop a a range of multicast addresses from traversing a
router...
is it that 'igmp access-g' stops clients from joining and 'multicast-boundary'
stops the address from transiting the router?

Regards,

John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net

• Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: BGP regular exp [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Cisco Net: "Re: Auto RP with sparse mode and listner will fall in to dense"
• Next in thread: Tiean: "Re: igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary"
• Maybe reply: Tiean: "Re: igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:38 GMT-3