frame-relay class Vs class

From: Cisco Net (network.cisco@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 20:16:28 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: rtr or SAA"
• Previous message: Matt M: "Re: rtr or SAA"
• Next in thread: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Maybe reply: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Maybe reply: Cisco Net: "Re: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi
I am confused when to use frame-relay class Vs "class" within the
frame-relay interface-dlci ?

Is it always recommend to specify the "class" after frame-relay
interface-dlci. ?
Because it is more granular and dlci specific.

Whereas frame-relay class is interface/sub interface specific ?
Any other caveats that i should know when i specify frame-relay class
on the interface with map-class details
Regards
Cert.

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: rtr or SAA"
• Previous message: Matt M: "Re: rtr or SAA"
• Next in thread: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Maybe reply: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Maybe reply: Cisco Net: "Re: frame-relay class Vs class"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:50 GMT-3