From: Cisco Net (network.cisco@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:28:13 GMT-3
Thank you. IE slides helped much too
Cert
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:47:49 +0800, Kian Wah, Lai <kian_wah@qala.com.sg> wrote:
>
> 'Frame-relay class' is used to specify the map-class to *all* DLCI on the
> interface or sub-interface where as 'class' only applies the map-class to a
> specific DLCI.
>
> [quote]
> Is it always recommend to specify the "class" after frame-relay
> interface-dlci. ?
> [/quote]
> Depends on what your requirements are :)
>
> For more information, see
> http://www.internetworkexpert.com/resources/01700368.htm
>
> Regards,
> Kian Wah
> Singapore Cisco User Group
> http://www.sgcug.org
> 3 routers + one PIX rental at SGD2/hr or USD1.30/hr
> http://rack.sgcug.org
> Good for testing or practicing.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Cisco Net
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 7:16 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: frame-relay class Vs class
>
> Hi
> I am confused when to use frame-relay class Vs "class" within the
> frame-relay interface-dlci ?
>
> Is it always recommend to specify the "class" after frame-relay
> interface-dlci. ?
> Because it is more granular and dlci specific.
>
> Whereas frame-relay class is interface/sub interface specific ?
> Any other caveats that i should know when i specify frame-relay class
> on the interface with map-class details
> Regards
> Cert.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:50 GMT-3