RE: Confused about words in QoS

From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Oct 08 2004 - 22:52:59 GMT-3


        Configuring RSVP enables the ability to have bandwidth reserved,
but does not actually reserve it. The usage of RSVP relies on the user
application (like softphone) to actually do the reservation.

HTH,

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Carlos G Mendioroz
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 6:18 PM
> To: gladston@br.ibm.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Confused about words in QoS
>
> Well,
> I would consider RSVP for allocate.
> But gee, this is a subtle english thing, so native speakers are best
> suited to talk about this.
>
> As long as you have a clear concept of diff serv/int serv, queuing,
> policing and shaping, the proctor should be able to clarify the rest
:-)
>
> gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:
>
> > ===============
> > quoted
> > 1. Limit/Restrict the bandwidth to 64 Kb
> > ( OR )
> > 2. Allocate the bandwidth of 64 Kb
> > ( OR )
> > 3. Assign the bandwidth of 64 Kb
> > ================
> >
> > Yeah, that is a bit confusing. On the Cisco Lab it would be better
> double check with the Proctor.
> >
> > As I understand it:
> > Limit/Restrict - Police with CBWFQ or CAR
> > Allocate/Assign - Bandwidth with CBWFQ (or old method as Custom
Queue if
> specified)
> >
> > Any other idea?
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:45 GMT-3