Dlsw

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Sep 30 2004 - 13:28:58 GMT-3

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Route map permit statements"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: Dlsw"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,

I've noticed that some parameters e.g. cost, circuit weight, etc can be used
on both the dlsw local peer and dlsw remote peer commands.

Is it always true that if the same parameter is configured on both dlsw peer
(local & remote), the parameter configured on the remote command takes
precedence?

TIA, Tim

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Route map permit statements"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Dlsw"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: Dlsw"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:51 GMT-3