RE: Dlsw

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Sep 30 2004 - 14:09:30 GMT-3


Correct. While advertised during the peer's capabilities exchange, I may
tell you one thing, but in your remote-peer statement to me, you "know
better" and whatever value you have locally for our peering relationship
overrides what I may try to tell you.

HTH,

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:29 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: Dlsw

Hi guys,

I've noticed that some parameters e.g. cost, circuit weight, etc can be used
on both the dlsw local peer and dlsw remote peer commands.

Is it always true that if the same parameter is configured on both dlsw peer
(local & remote), the parameter configured on the remote command takes
precedence?

TIA, Tim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:51 GMT-3