From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Sep 30 2004 - 15:56:46 GMT-3
Correct.
All filtering WITHIN DLSW (e.g. the methods you listed) MUST be in the evil,
er.... token-ring format. So if you are given a MAC on your lab, verify
whether it is an ethernet MAC address or a pre-converted address.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net <http://www.ipexpert.net/>
_____
From: mani poopal [mailto:mani_ccie@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 1:38 PM
To: Scott Morris; 'ccie2be'; 'Group Study'
Subject: RE: Dlsw
Hi Scott,
Whenever you want to filter any mac address in dlsw, by using icanreach
command or filtering(by any three methods ie: remote peer statment,
prom-peer default statement or peer-on-demand default statements), do we
have to change the given mac address in to non canonical format(assume in
the scenario they are not specifying mac address format ie:ethernet or token
ring)
thanks
Mani
Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
Correct. While advertised during the peer's capabilities exchange, I may
tell you one thing, but in your remote-peer statement to me, you "know
better" and whatever value you have locally for our peering relationship
overrides what I may try to tell you.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:29 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: Dlsw
Hi guys,
I've noticed that some parameters e.g. cost, circuit weight, etc can be used
on both the dlsw local peer and dlsw remote peer commands.
Is it always true that if the same parameter is configured on both dlsw peer
(local & remote), the parameter configured on the remote command takes
precedence?
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:51 GMT-3