From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 - 22:08:58 GMT-3
This is true if there is only one VC on the multipoint
interface. If there are multiple VCs, their status must all be inactive
(or deleted) before the line protocol of the multipoint interface is
brought down.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 7:04 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RE: Frame-relay interface Tracking
>
> As I wasn't so sure of what happen to interface status if only PVC
failed,
> I compare physical, point-to-point, and multipoints, and concluded the
> following with verification in my lab. I hope this is correct.
>
> Upon PVC failed,
> Physical interface is up and up
> Point-to-point subinterface link goes to down/down
> Multipoint subinterface is up and up
> with below config using end-to-end keepalive, Mulitpoint is down and
down
>
> R2
> interface Serial0.12 multipoint
> ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay class end2end
> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.1 205 broadcast
>
> map-class frame-relay end2end
> frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode request
>
> R1
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay class end2end
> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.2 502 broadcast
>
> map-class frame-relay end2end
> frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode reply
>
>
> Jongsoo
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:07 GMT-3