From: Joseph D. Phillips (josephdphillips@fastmail.us)
Date: Thu Jul 29 2004 - 12:53:35 GMT-3
I am strangely at peace. I slept rather well last night for the first
time in weeks.
My strategy this time around:
1. More reading, less rack time. I am weak on QoS and Multicast, as are
most people, I think. There are no well-written texts on these subjects,
from what I hear. I certainly haven't found any. I need Multicast For
Retards, or something. In principle, it seems rather straightforward,
but all this fine tuning of multicast and classification of multicast
groups is throwing me.
2. Bombard groupstudy with questions about everything. Filter responses
from the disembodied huge-craniumed thought-beings (Howard, Brians,
Scott, some of the other low-numbered folks) into a separate e-mail
folder and reread their explanations.
3. Stay close to you and John Matus, for purposes of my own sanity, and
to help retain information. I find that if I regurgitate what I know to
someone else, regardless of circumstance, I confirm what I know, for one
thing, and I accrue a psychological benefit from helping someone, too. I
just feel better after that type of conversation is over.
4. Experiment with a tutor. The one that took 5 times to pass isn't
necessarily bad. At least he knows what's on the exam. The other ones
probably don't.
More in a moment.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:58:23 -0700, "Felice Russell"
<felicear@sbcglobal.net> said:
> No..you didn't make me feel bad. I think I am gonna have to learn all
> this
> obscure multicast crap from the nmc labs.
> My score did improve about 7% from my last effort which is good but I am
> angry about a couple things. I feel like I nailed 2 of 3 of the qos
> questions. I also don't think my multicast score was accurate. I would
> not
> have passed even if I had gotten those points. I got 100 percent on the
> bgp
> and if you want to go over that I would be cool with it. You did better
> overall on the igp than I did. I thought I did a little better there as
> well
> but that acl thing really hurt me. I think I may not have gotten all my
> connected routes into the igp which would have hurt me as well.
> I think I will have to start over at the beginning of the nmc labs and go
> over every minute detail. Their qos is not in depth enough.
> So how are you feeling? Do you have any idea when you are gonna try
> again?
>
> Be careful of that guy offering free services. He is sometimes nasty in
> his
> posts. It also took him 5 times to pass...so he is more like us and not
> so
> much like the Howards...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:josephdphillips@fastmail.us]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:50 AM
> To: Felice Russell
> Subject: RE: Results
>
>
> I'm sorry I made you feel bad, if I did. I was just asking so I could
> help
> somehow.
>
> One of the group study recent-CCIE-winners is offering tutorial services.
> I
> may take him up on it.
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:44:53 -0700, "Felice Russell"
> <felicear@sbcglobal.net> said:
> > I already told you I failed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:06 GMT-3