Re: ISDN multilink dialer error

From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Sun Jul 11 2004 - 15:36:51 GMT-3


yes, two calls are fine with test call:

R2#sh isdn act
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 ISDN ACTIVE CALLS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call Calling Called Remote Seconds Seconds Seconds Charges
Type Number Number Name Used Left Idle
Units/Currency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out ---N/A--- 3333000 R5 56 Unavail - 0
Out ---N/A--- 3333001 R5 14 Unavail - 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

q931 shows that call is being attepmted and a busy is being returned
(which is right) but somehow the router is not interpreting this and is
not jumping to the next number :-(

I have two SPIDs, but yes, this is an ADTRAN Atlas, so this may be a
protocol quirk.
I guess that dialer order would help, but I'm on 12.2 and this is 12.2T :-(

Brian Dennis wrote:

> Carlos,
> Resend the output of the debug now. Also add in the debug from
> "debug isdn q931". Also can you manually have two calls connected
> simultaneously using the "isdn test call" command?
>
> I've seen this more than once and a reboot always solve the
> problem. The routers were 2600/3600's running 12.2T using 1 SPID with
> an Adtran Atlas 800.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 10:51 AM
> To: Brian Dennis
> Cc: Group Study
> Subject: Re: ISDN multilink dialer error
>
> No good.
> I know it helps sometimes, MPLS on 2500s ? :-)
> But it seems this is not one of those cases. Same error.
> I know I can change to profiles, but just wanted to nail this down :-(
>
> Brian Dennis wrote:
>
>
>>Carlos,
>> I hate to give this kind of advice but try rebooting the router.
>>Rebooting the router is the last gasp of a desperate engineer ;-)
>>
>>Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>>bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>
> Of
>
>>Carlos G Mendioroz
>>Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 10:30 AM
>>To: Group Study
>>Subject: ISDN multilink dialer error
>>
>>I'm trying to bring a multilink with 2 channels at once by doing:
>>
>>interface BRI0/0
>> ip address 172.30.25.2 255.255.255.0
>> encapsulation ppp
>> dialer map ip 172.30.25.5 name R5 broadcast 3333000
>> dialer map ip 172.30.25.5 name R5 broadcast 3333001
>> dialer-group 1
>> isdn switch-type basic-dms100
>> isdn spid1 25633320000101 3332000
>> isdn spid2 25633320010101 3332001
>> ppp authentication chap
>> ppp multilink
>> multilink min-links 2
>>end
>>
>>but when triggered, only one channel links, and the following error
>>shows up:
>>
>>2d21h: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.30.25.2, d=172.30.25.5)
>>2d21h: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 3333000
>>2d21h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up.
>>2d21h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to up
>>2d21h: Vi1 DDR: Dialer statechange to up
>>2d21h: Vi1 DDR: Dialer call has been placed
>>2d21h: Vi1 DDR: dialer protocol up
>>2d21h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1,
>
> changed
>
>>state to up
>>2d21h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>
> Virtual-Access1,
>
>>changed state to up
>>2d21h: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 3333000
>>2d21h: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 3333000
>>R5
>>2d21h: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8041
>>2d21h: BR0/0 DDR: Already 1 call(s) in progress on BR0/0, dialing not
>>allowed
>>
>>Where is this "already 1 call" limit coming from ?
>>Tried max-links 2 w/o success.
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron@huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:52 GMT-3