RE: advertising an interface in BGP

From: James Marinas (jmarinas@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 09:26:28 GMT-3


the 'network x.x.x.x' statment installs the route as an 'i' origin code
in the bgp table indicating the route was learned through iBGP

the 'redistribute connected' statement installs the route with an '?'
origin code which means that the prefix was learned though an IGP or was
redistributed

>From: "john matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net> >Reply-To: "john matus"
<jmatus@pacbell.net> >To: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Subject:
advertising an interface in BGP >Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 23:55:37 -0700 >
>is there a difference between the following? > >router bgp 100 >net
150.1.1.1 m 255.255.255.0 > >and > >router bgp 100 >redistribute
connected ... assuming that 150.1.1.1 is a loopback interface or >a
connected interface? i recall that IGP's, using the redistribute command
>does not active the protocol on the interface but using the network
command >does.....does this sound right? >thanks in advance for your
help! > >Regards, > >John D. Matus >MCSE, CCNP >818.782.2061 office
>818.430.8372 mobile >jmatus@pacbell.net >
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com > >Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------

FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar  get it now!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:32 GMT-3