From: Georg Pauwen (pauwen@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 04:15:26 GMT-3
Hello,
would the dialer-group statement only NOT be necessary in a scenario where
only one site can initiate the call ? In that regard, dialer watch has no
relation to the dialer-group statement...
Regards,
GP
>From: Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
>Reply-To: Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
>To: Tomikawa <h-tomikawa@syscomusa.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Dialer-watch
>Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 23:18:29 +0100
>
>You don't need the dialer-group but it depends on the requirements of the
>scenario. You can have both if you need to have the bri/dialer interface up
>when you lose a route or/and when you ping for example,
>
>--Richard
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tomikawa [mailto:h-tomikawa@syscomusa.com]
>Sent: jueves, 03 de junio de 2004 0:04
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Dialer-watch
>
>
>Hi group.
>
>Maybe this topic was discussed before, but I would like to comfirm my
>mind!!! When you use "dialer-watch", do you sitll put 'dialer-group" as
>well? I read CCO and some example still use "dialer-group' as well. But,
>"dialer-watch" is dependant on "interest traffiic" it also says.
>
>Can someone clear this up?
>
>Thanks
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:32 GMT-3