From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@wamnetgov.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 14:45:11 GMT-3
Sounds like a pretty big rollout. Make sure Cisco knows how big this
project is, and maybe you can get the right person at Cisco to work on
it faster, or at least get you some interim releases that aren't
available to the public. Casually mention that your boss is leaning
towards Juniper/Netscreen :)
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnetgov.com
PGP key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
com
_____
From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:37 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bugs
I have been thinking about not using this feature. The problem is that I
did the testing of the configs with periodic dpd's enabled and I
remember there was a problem with RRI when tunnel failover occurred if
this feature was not used.
Also GRE is not being used to avoid the config burden when hundreds of
sites have to be configured on the main hubs,
--Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@wamnetgov.com]
Sent: lunes, 24 de mayo de 2004 19:31
To: Richard Dumoulin
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bugs
Looks like you might be waiting a little while then. Like
others said, might be a month. Or make do with a stable version, and
not use this feature for a little while. Tunnel interfaces with
keepalives might simulate the dead peer detection functionality.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnetgov.com
PGP key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
com
_____
From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Church, Chuck; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bugs
The problem is this T version is the only one supporting
Periodic Dead Peer Detection !!
-----Original Message-----
From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@wamnetgov.com]
Sent: lunes, 24 de mayo de 2004 17:58
To: Richard Dumoulin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bugs
Since it's a 'T' version, they probably put it at a lower
priority than
bugs affecting GD or mainline releases. Usually if the issue
can be
solved by using a different version (for example 12.2.15
mainline does what you need), the TAC will give you that as a short-term
solution. Unless you absolutely, positively need a 'T' version, don't
use one in production...
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team 13665
Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250 Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnetgov.com
PGP key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Dumoulin
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Bugs
Hi group, from your experience, how reactive is Cisco with bugs
in the ios. If I am using one of the latest codes 12.3.7(T) in a
production environment but there is a bug according to a TAC engineer
how much time can pass until it is solved ?
Thanks
--Richard
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:16 GMT-3