From: Mike Taylor (mike.taylor@mail.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 19:13:39 GMT-3
From the little I can gather about what you are trying to accomplish from
this thread, I think the following might be relevant:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml
I just rolled out a large dynamic multipoint VPN solution for a customer,
and needed GRE to support some non-IP and multicast traffic. I've found the
configuration to be very flexible and resilient.
HTH,
Mike Taylor - 9658
----- Original Message -----
From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@wamnetgov.com>
To: "Richard Dumoulin" <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: Bugs
> Sounds like a pretty big rollout. Make sure Cisco knows how big this
> project is, and maybe you can get the right person at Cisco to work on
> it faster, or at least get you some interim releases that aren't
> available to the public. Casually mention that your boss is leaning
> towards Juniper/Netscreen :)
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
> 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> PGP key:
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> com
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:37 PM
> To: Church, Chuck
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Bugs
>
>
> I have been thinking about not using this feature. The problem is that I
> did the testing of the configs with periodic dpd's enabled and I
> remember there was a problem with RRI when tunnel failover occurred if
> this feature was not used.
> Also GRE is not being used to avoid the config burden when hundreds of
> sites have to be configured on the main hubs,
>
> --Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@wamnetgov.com]
> Sent: lunes, 24 de mayo de 2004 19:31
> To: Richard Dumoulin
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Bugs
>
>
>
> Looks like you might be waiting a little while then. Like
> others said, might be a month. Or make do with a stable version, and
> not use this feature for a little while. Tunnel interfaces with
> keepalives might simulate the dead peer detection functionality.
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
> 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> PGP key:
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> com
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:03 PM
> To: Church, Chuck; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Bugs
>
>
>
> The problem is this T version is the only one supporting
> Periodic Dead Peer Detection !!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@wamnetgov.com]
> Sent: lunes, 24 de mayo de 2004 17:58
> To: Richard Dumoulin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Bugs
>
>
> Since it's a 'T' version, they probably put it at a lower
> priority than
> bugs affecting GD or mainline releases. Usually if the issue
> can be
> solved by using a different version (for example 12.2.15
> mainline does what you need), the TAC will give you that as a short-term
> solution. Unless you absolutely, positively need a 'T' version, don't
> use one in production...
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team 13665
> Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250 Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> PGP key:
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
>
> com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Richard Dumoulin
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:06 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Bugs
>
> Hi group, from your experience, how reactive is Cisco with bugs
> in the ios. If I am using one of the latest codes 12.3.7(T) in a
> production environment but there is a bug according to a TAC engineer
> how much time can pass until it is solved ?
>
> Thanks
>
> --Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:16 GMT-3