From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu May 06 2004 - 11:08:30 GMT-3
Howard,
You missed the smiley face underneath the signature line.
:)
I was being facetious.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:00 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Urgent: Who can send me the details about the new lab exam
using 148.xx.xx.xx address
At 9:43 AM -0400 5/6/04, Scott Morris wrote:
>I think that would be very confusing to any CCIE candidate when they
>change the IP addressing range like that.
>
>Check the "what's new" section on the CCIE pages. I know they're
>upgrading to 12.2T, but I haven't heard anything about them changing
>addresses like that. So let's not carry this too far! Before you know
>it, candidates will be trying to practice on EVERY IP range there is,
>and nobody will ever pass the test any more!
Maybe I'm missing something, but if someone at what I think of at the CCIE
level can't cope with any standard address range, without slowing down at
all, they aren't ready.
In some practice scenarios that I'll soon have available, I use a
combination of address ranges. One part of the topology is deliberately
classless. Another part is classful but can be treated as classless, but is
there to be able to create discontiguous network and similar
classful-related problems. Yet other ranges are used for connection to
external simulated ISPs, and there's also the equivalent of a
provider-assigned range to which one would NAT.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:06 GMT-3