From: Moffat, Ed (EMoffat@fsci.com)
Date: Thu May 06 2004 - 11:09:17 GMT-3
Apparently my attempt at sarcasm was misinterpreted.
-Ed-
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb@gettcomm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:03 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Urgent: Who can send me the details about the new lab exam u
sing 148.xx.xx.xx address
At 6:54 AM -0700 5/6/04, Moffat, Ed wrote:
>I heard that IOS 12.2T may actually express IP addresses in Hex so I
>suggest every one practice this (148/16) with the 94.00.00.00
>FF.00.00.00 address space just to cover the bases.
>
>I'm not clear whether the new scheme uses canonical or non-canonical
>addressing format though so better consider that as well. ;-}
>
This would make sense for IPv6, but I wouldn't think the lab is principally
V6. Certainly, there's been no sentiment in the IETF to express V4 in hex.
Indeed, for the specific 4-in-6 address format, the v6 address is written as
a hex prefix with dotted decimal in the last 32 bit positions.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:06 GMT-3