From: Bill Lijewski (bill@eccie.com)
Date: Mon Mar 15 2004 - 21:27:27 GMT-3
Here are a couple of quick things to check:
1) Are the IP addresses you are using to neighbor up the BGP reachable?
(Can you PING them?)
2) Are the neighbors Internal or External? If they are internal BGP
should go 255 hops to find it's neighbor, however if you are using
Loopbacks you will need to use the 'update-source' command. If they are
external BGP, external BGP will only go 1 hop by default. So if you are
using Loopbacks you will need the 'update-source' command as well as the
'ebgp-multihop' command to allow external BGP to go more than one hop to
find it's neighbor.
Can you post the configs for your two routers?
- Bill Lijewski
CCIE#8642
Network Learning Inc
5 Day R&S CCIE Bootcamp Instructor
bill@eccie.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
john matus
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: bgp queston [bcc][faked-from][bayes]
Importance: Low
what do you have to do too get 2 bgp peer that are stuck in active/idle
w/
an up/down of never to connect (under 'sh ip b sum')?
i cant figure this out!....or what is it indicative of?
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
818.782.2061 office
818.430.8372 mobile
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio Jimenez Arguedas" <sejimenez@its.co.cr>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:41 PM
Subject: Fw: REDISTRIBUTE IN OSPF
> Sure,
>
>
> R3_sh run
>
>
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 130.10.31.1 255.255.255.224
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 130.10.31.33 255.255.255.224
> !
> interface Loopback33
> ip address 33.33.33.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 130.10.30.3 255.255.255.0
> half-duplex
> !
> interface TokenRing0/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> ring-speed 16
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> bandwidth 128
> ip address 130.10.134.3 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf priority 0
> no arp frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 130.10.134.1 100 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 130.10.134.4 100 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> interface Serial1/1
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1/2
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1/3
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute connected metric 10 subnets
> network 130.10.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 3
> network 130.10.134.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
>
>
> R4_sh run
>
>
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 130.10.41.1 255.255.255.252
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 130.10.41.5 255.255.255.252
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 130.10.40.4 255.255.255.0
> half-duplex
> !
> interface TokenRing0/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> ring-speed 16
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> bandwidth 128
> ip address 130.10.134.4 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf network non-broadcast
> ip ospf priority 0
> no arp frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 130.10.134.1 110 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 130.10.134.3 110 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> interface Serial1/1
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1/2
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1/3
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> summary-address 130.10.41.0 255.255.255.0
> redistribute connected metric 5 subnets route-map LOOPBACKS
> network 130.10.40.0 0.0.0.255 area 4
> network 130.10.134.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
> ip classless
> ip http server
> !
> access-list 10 permit 130.10.41.0 0.0.0.3
> access-list 10 permit 130.10.41.4 0.0.0.3
> route-map LOOPBACKS permit 10
> match ip address 10
> !
> !
> !
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
> To: "Sergio Jimenez Arguedas" <sejimenez@its.co.cr>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:32 PM
> Subject: RE: REDISTRIBUTE IN OSPF
>
>
> > Sergio,
> >
> > Seems as if you have a problem with your route-map / access list
> configuration. Can you post your configurations for at least these
sections
> (entire configs would be even better!)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Ken
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Sergio Jimenez Arguedas
> > Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 3:32 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Cc:
> > Subject: REDISTRIBUTE IN OSPF
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> >
> > I have a big problem with the following scenario:
> >
> > E0/0: Net in OSPF AREA 4
> > |
> > |
> > R4--s1/0--------------------FR_SW---------------s0/0--R1
> > FR_SW
> > R3--s1/0--------------------FR_SW
> > |
> > |
> > E0/0: Net in OSPF AREA 3
> >
> >
> > * AREA 0: OSPF Netw: point-to-multipoint //// Subnet:
130.10.134.0/24
> > R1, S0/0
> > R4, S1/0
> > R3, S1/0
> >
> >
> > *Loopbacks in R4:
> >
> > Lo0: 130.10.41.1/30
> > Lo1: 130.10.41.5/30
> >
> > *Loopbacks in R3
> >
> > Lo0: 130.10.31.1/27
> > Lo1: 130.10.31.33/27
> > Lo33: 33.33.33.3/27
> >
> >
> > ****Problem: In both R3/R4 I redistribute connected (Only int
loopbacks,
> I
> > used a route-map to avoid E0/0 to be redistribute), but R1 only
received
> > Type-5: 33.33.33.0/27.
> >
> > R1 didn4t receive R3`s/R4`s Lo0, Lo1. However R1 receives Subnets of
the
> Area
> > 3 and Area 4.(130.10.40.0/24&130.10.30.0/24)
> >
> >
> > Could somebody help me?
> >
> >
> > Note: I changed the ospf network type by non-broadcast but the
problem
> > continue!!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sergio Jiminez A.
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:30 GMT-3