From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Feb 26 2004 - 22:53:01 GMT-3
Correct. "max-reserved-bandwidth" does not apply to a
service-policy called from FRTS. The mincir value alone controls the
available bandwidth.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karim [mailto:karim_ccie@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:34 PM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth 100)
>
> Brian,
>
> Thanks for your explanation and time. But does this mean that I still
> multiply 512K by 0.75 to get the avaiable bandwidth ?
> Also does your comment means that the equation Snyder posted is right ?
>
> Frame-Relay Available bandwidth = Minicir -RTP - LLQ - RSVP
>
> Take into consideration that the 0.75 wasn't stated in the previous
> equation.
>
>
> Regards,
> Karim.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> To: "'Karim'" <karim_ccie@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:05 AM
> Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth 100)
>
>
> > Karim,
> >
> > Assuming you mean a Frame Relay PVC, it depends if you are applying
> > the service-policy through Frame Relay Traffic Shaping. If you are
> applying
> > the service-policy to the interface itself, you should set the
> "bandwidth"
> > of the interface to 512. If you are running FRTS you should set the
> mincir
> > to 512000. When running FRTS the interface bandwidth value does not
> apply
> > to the MQC.
> >
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karim [mailto:karim_ccie@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:46 PM
> > > To: Brian McGahan; 'Packet Man'; deivi78@hotmail.com; antonio.sanchez-
> > > monge@hp.com; msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Cc: alsontra@hotmail.com
> > > Subject: Re: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth
> 100)
> > >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > Suppose that we have the following:
> > > - A customer pvc of 512K.
> > > - Port speed (interface bandwidth) of 2M.
> > > - And 64K is reserved for RTP.
> > > - 64K for LLQ.
> > >
> > > What will be the bandwidth value to be configured using the interface
> "
> > > bandwidth" command ??
> > > Would it be bandwidth 512, or bandwidth 512* 0.75, or something else
> > > (confused how RTP value will be involved).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Karim.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > To: "'Packet Man'" <ccie2b@hotmail.com>; <deivi78@hotmail.com>;
> > > <antonio.sanchez-monge@hp.com>; <msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com>;
> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Cc: <alsontra@hotmail.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:14 AM
> > > Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth
> 100)
> > >
> > >
> > > > The interface "bandwidth" command is what the available bandwidth
> > > > value is based off of.
> > > >
> > > > Available bandwidth = (interface_bandwidth *
> max-reserved-bandwidth/100)
> > > -
> > > > RTP - LLQ - RSVP
> > > >
> > > > The reason you would need to specify the bandwidth value is when the
> > > > provisioned rate of the interface does not match the interface
> bandwidth
> > > > command. For example, suppose you have a 1Mbps circuit you are
> leasing
> > > that
> > > > is dropped off as FastEthernet. Although the interface bandwidth is
> > > > 100Mbps, it would not make sense to calculate a QoS policy on
> 100Mbps,
> > > as
> > > > the upstream provider is policing at 1Mbps. Therefore the
> "bandwidth"
> > > value
> > > > should be adjusted to 1Mbps.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > > >
> > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Packet Man [mailto:ccie2b@hotmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:31 PM
> > > > > To: deivi78@hotmail.com; bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com;
> > > antonio.sanchez-
> > > > > monge@hp.com; msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Cc: alsontra@hotmail.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth
> > > 100)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not positive about this but my guess and what I've heard is
> that
> > > the
> > > > > bandwidth interface command's function is to let the routing
> protocol
> > > how
> > > > > much bandwidth is avaiable on a link which in turn some portocols
> use
> > > to
> > > > > compute cost or metric (OSPF or Eigrp).
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what bandwidth QoS uses or where it gets the
> bandwidth
> > > amount
> > > > > when it needs to compute a percentage. But, I do know that with
> some
> > > QoS
> > > > > features, various parameters should be based on the actual
> bandwidth
> > > > > rather
> > > > > than the policed or shaped bandwidth. I don't remember all the
> > > details,
> > > > > but
> > > > > I came across this info in the DQoS book.
> > > > >
> > > > > HTH
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "David Hurtado" <deivi78@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >Reply-To: "David Hurtado" <deivi78@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >To: bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com, antonio.sanchez-
> monge@hp.com,
> > > > > >msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > >CC: alsontra@hotmail.com
> > > > > >Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-
> bandwidth
> > > 100)
> > > > > >Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:52:55 +0000
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Hello everybody,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I stiil don't know why to use the "bandwidth" command in
> interface
> > > mode
> > > > > >when configuring CBWFQ if you are respecting the
> > > > > >maximum-reserve-bandwidth limitation:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >class-map match-all ICMP
> > > > > >match access-group 101
> > > > > >
> > > > > > policy-map ICMP_BW
> > > > > >class ICMP
> > > > > >bandwidth 128
> > > > > >
> > > > > > interface fa1/0/0
> > > > > >bandwidth 1500 <-----------------------------When does this
> need
> to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > specified?
> > > > > >service-policy output ICMP_BW
> > > > > >
> > > > > >128 kbps is not over 75% of the FastEternet BW. Why do i have to
> > > > > >configure "bandwidth 1500"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Could somebody explain it to me, please?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thanks a lot
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >From: "Brian McGahan" >Reply-To: "Brian McGahan" >To:
> > > > > >"'SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)'" , "'Michael Snyder'"
> ,
> > > > > > >CC: >Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth reservation
> > > (max-reserved-bandwidth
> > > > > >100) >Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:24:08 -0600 > > As long as you
> take
> > > this
> > > > > >network traffic into account you are fine. >For example, on a
> GigE
> > > link,
> > > > > >it's a little ridiculous to say that 250Mbps of >traffic will be
> > > network
> > > > > >traffic. If you configure a class (i.e. not >class-default)
> which
> > > > > >matches your routing traffic and network traffic and >reserve the
> > > > > >appropriate bandwidth for it you are fine. > > Depending on the
> > > platform
> > > > > >the router may employ it's own queueing >strategy for essential
> > > network
> > > > > >control traffic. For more info see this cco >doc: >
> > > > > > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/rtgupdates.html > > >HTH,
> >
> > > >Brian
> > > > > >McGahan, CCIE #8593 >bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com >
> >Internetwork
> > > > > >Expert, Inc. >http://www.InternetworkExpert.com >Toll Free:
> > > 877-224-8987
> > > > > >x 705 >Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705 > > > > -----Original
> > > Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> On
> > > Behalf
> > > > > >Of > > SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2) > > Sent: Wednesday,
> > > > > >February 25, 2004 10:07 AM > > To: 'Michael Snyder';
> > > > > >ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Cc: alsontra@hotmail.com > > Subject:
> RE:
> > > MQC
> > > > > >for bandwidth reservation (max-reserved-bandwidth 100) > > > > Hi
> > > > > >Michael, > > > > -> Won't max-reserved-bandwidth 100 be a good
> > > default
> > > > > >command to use with > > MQC interfaces? > > > > Reserving 100% of
> the
> > > > > >total bandwidth may starve the router generated > > traffic and
> break
> > > > > >routing protocols and other essential management > > traffic. > >
> > > That's
> > > > > >why it is 75% by default and not 100%. > > > > Cheers, > > Ato. >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Snyder
> > > > > >[mailto:msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com] > > Sent: miircoles, 25
> de
> > > > > >febrero de 2004 16:52 > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Cc:
> > > > > >alsontra@hotmail.com > > Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth
> reservation
> > > > > >(max-reserved-bandwidth 100) > > > > > > Well, if you are using
> more
> > > that
> > > > > >75% of the bandwidth value (per the show > > int cmd) then you
> need
> > > to
> > > up
> > > > > >the upper limit. > > > > R8(config-if)#max-reserved-bandwidth 100
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >Which brings up a question, > > > > Won't max-reserved-bandwidth
> 100
> > > be
> > > a
> > > > > >good default command to use with MQC > > interfaces? > > > > > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: alsontra@hotmail.com
> > > > > >[mailto:alsontra@hotmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25,
> 2004
> > > > > >11:08 AM > > To: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2);
> > > > > >ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Subject: Re: MQC for bandwidth
> reservation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you Ato. > > > > My question was more in regards of
> > > whether
> > > or
> > > > > >not you have to specify the > > command when reserving bandwidth.
> > > I've
> > > > > >seen MQC configurations with and > > without the interface level
> > > > > >bandwidth command. I think your saying that I > > only need to
> > > specify
> > > > > >bandwidth if the reference bandwidth is different > > than > >
> the
> > > > > >interface bandwidth. > > > > > > Thanks > > Alsontra > > > > > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > From: "SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO
> > > > > >(HP-France,ex2)" > > monge@hp.com> > > To: ; > > Sent: Wednesday,
> > > > > >February 25, 2004 2:29 AM > > Subject: RE: MQC for bandwidth
> > > reservation
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alsontra, > > > > Both bandwidth commands have
> very
> > > > > >different meanings. > > > > Under the interface, it means the
> total
> > > > > >reference bandwidth. Used for QoS > > but also for routing
> protocols,
> > > > > >etc... Normally you need to change it in > > serial interfaces
> where
> > > the
> > > > > >real bandwidth is different from T1, etc... > > > > Under the
> class
> > > in
> > > a
> > > > > >policy map, it is the bandwidth you want to reserve > > for > > a
> > > > > >particular class. The total reserved bandwidth cannot exceed by
> > > default
> > > >
> > > > > > > 75% of the reference bandwidth. > > > > Cheers, > > Ato. > > >
> >
> > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > > >[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > >
> alsontra@hotmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >Sent: miircoles, 25 de febrero de 2004 11:01 > > To:
> > > > > >ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Subject: MQC for bandwidth reservation
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > When is the interface level bandwidth command used or needed
> > > with
> > > > > >MQC? > > > > For example: > > > > class-map match-all ICMP > >
> > > match
> > > > > >access-group 101 > > > > policy-map ICMP_BW > > class ICMP > >
> > > > > >bandwidth 128 > > > > interface fa1/0/0 >
> > > > > > > bandwidth 1500 <-----------------------------When does
> this
> > > need
> > > > > >to > > be > > specified? > > service-policy output ICMP_BW >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > If I don't specify this, what value dose the interface
> policy
> > > use?
> > > > > >The > > interface bandwidth rate? And if so why would I want to
> > > change
> > > > > >it? > > > > > > Alsontra > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > > > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials
> > > > > from:
> > > > > > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > > Subscription information
> may
> > > be
> > > > > >found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > > > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials
> > > > > from:
> > > > > > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > > Subscription information
> may
> > > be
> > > > > >found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > > > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials
> > > > > from:
> > > > > > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > > Subscription information
> may
> > > be
> > > > > >found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > > > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials
> > > > > from:
> > > > > > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > > Subscription information
> may
> > > be
> > > > > >found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials
> > > from:
> > > > > > >http://shop.groupstudy.com > >Subscription information may be
> found
> > > at:
> > > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Horsscopo, tarot, numerologma... Escucha lo que te dicen los
> astros.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> > > from:
> > > > > >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click
> here.
> > > > > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
> > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:58 GMT-3