DLSW Encapsulation choices

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Sat Feb 07 2004 - 03:35:27 GMT-3

• Next message: Arvind Yadav: "Passive FTP"
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: NBMA- Mode with Dense and sparse-dense PIM!"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,
 
If two DLSW routers are being configured to peer directly across a Frame
Relay cloud, should frame relay encapsulation ALWAYS be used?
 
dlsw remote-peer 0 [frame-relay] interface serial 0 111
 
Thanks,
Danny

• Next message: Arvind Yadav: "Passive FTP"
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: NBMA- Mode with Dense and sparse-dense PIM!"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:47 GMT-3