RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:22:48 GMT-3

• Next message: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: Ping Brian McGahan - Your NTP Paper"
• Previous message: kasturi cisco: "RE: Ping Brian McGahan - Your NTP Paper"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Does anyone else have any other thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:35 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Encapsulation choices

Hello,
 
If two DLSW routers are being configured to peer directly across a Frame Relay cloud, should frame relay encapsulation ALWAYS be used?
 
dlsw remote-peer 0 [frame-relay] interface serial 0 111
 
Thanks,
Danny

• Next message: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: Ping Brian McGahan - Your NTP Paper"
• Previous message: kasturi cisco: "RE: Ping Brian McGahan - Your NTP Paper"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: DLSW Encapsulation choices"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:48 GMT-3