From: ward Priestman (ccie@priestman.org)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 08:38:54 GMT-3
the routes are working i have full routes so that discounts 1 and 4 2 will
work but i want to do it without and i am left with 3.
essentially i really want to know why ip will not let me accept a packet and
then resend the packet out of the same interface it came in on
Ward
----- Original Message -----
From: <OzgurG@garanti.com.tr>
To: <ccie@priestman.org>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: Frame relay and eigrp question
you probably thought of these...
but let me rephrase...
1-static routes on b and c
2-p2p subinterfaces on b and c
3-policy routing
4-default routes advertised by a to b and c
since there is no mechanism to generate /32 routes
like in a ospf p2mp interface,
there is nothing else i suppose to meet your requirements...
good luck
Ozgur
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ward Priestman
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Frame relay and eigrp question
I have 3 routers on Frame relay
router a
|
|
/ \
/ \
/ \
router b router c
running eigrp 1
have one frame map statement on b and c and two on a
Have turned split horizon off on a and get full routing tables. but when i
try
to get to b from c or vice versa i get ip redirects from a and no
connectivity.
any way to solve this without additional frame maps of sub
interfaces/subnets
thanks
Ward
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:47 GMT-3