From: Tomikawa (h-tomikawa@syscomusa.com)
Date: Tue Dec 23 2003 - 19:20:02 GMT-3
Thank you, Brian.
How about "bridge-group 1 circuit-group 1" command.
Does this work, too?
Brian McGahan wrote:
>Tomi,
>
> Try putting the serial interfaces in a multilink group and putting
>the bridge-group command on the multilink interface. Another option would
>be to create a GRE tunnel between the two routers that load balances over
>the serial links. Then put the bridge-group command on both the tunnel and
>the LAN interfaces.
>
>
>HTH,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>Tomikawa
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 3:44 PM
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: Bridging 2 serial interface
>>
>>Hi, Group.
>>
>>I would like to have a question.
>>One router is connected to another router via 2 serial interface. (T1)
>>Somehow, I have to configure bridging between 2 LAN through these routers.
>>If I simply configure "bridge-group" in all serial interfaces, of course
>>one interface
>>will be "blocked" by spanning tree.
>>
>>What is the best way to bundle these 2 serial interface as one
>>spanning-tree instance.
>>Using "bridge-group 1 circuit-group1" or enable PPP and bundling?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Tomi
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:44 GMT-3