From: cdmurray@statestreet.com
Date: Thu Dec 18 2003 - 21:29:47 GMT-3
I don't usually say much but we're really coming out of the woodwork. When
our very world is threatened we emerge.
So sad to see this as Paul gives so much of his own to support this list
and the Brians are just priceless
with there input. I'm sure it wasn't meant to come to this. Tomorrows a new
day.
Regards,
Christine Murray
"Dave Swink
\(dswink\)" To: "'Paul Borghese'" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
<dswink@cisco.com cc:
> Subject: RE: Supporting GroupStudy
Sent by:
nobody@groupstudy
.com
19/12/2003 10:16
AM
Please respond to
"Dave Swink
\(dswink\)"
Paul, Brian and Brian,
We appreciate and respect all of you immensely. Viewed through all of
your contributions and professionalism, this is an obvious case of
miscommunciation. Dropped packets? Duplex mismatch?
Dave Swink
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Borghese
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:36 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Supporting GroupStudy
Whoa! My e-mail was not interpreted the way I desired. I did not wish
to imply that the Brian's are not valuable contributors. But rather I
was simply answering the question from a previous poster about
workbooks.
Having re-read my original e-mail I now realize it was worded horribly
incorrect and can quite easily be interpreted in a way I did not intend.
I would like to apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:43 GMT-3