EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast.

From: Karim AbdelMonem (karim_ccie@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 08 2003 - 21:38:08 GMT-3

• Next message: Messina, John V: "OT- MTU issues."
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: About RSVP with FR"
• Next in thread: Carter, Lee: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Maybe reply: Carter, Lee: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Maybe reply: Karim AbdelMonem: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

While having RIP or EIGRP configured on a NBMA (F.R.) hub and spoke
topology, with the hub using main interface, neighbor command will be needed
on both hub and spoke sides. Is it a must to configure passive interface for
the interfaces joining the frame-relay network?

Another question about rip v1:
To have 2 RIP-v1 routers using unicast instead of broadcast for routing
updates, a neighbor command also will be used on both sides but do i need (a
must or not) passive interface on the interfaces of the 2 routers or is it
optional??

Thanks in advance for co-operation,
Karim.

• Next message: Messina, John V: "OT- MTU issues."
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: About RSVP with FR"
• Next in thread: Carter, Lee: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Maybe reply: Carter, Lee: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Maybe reply: Karim AbdelMonem: "RE: EIGRP on NBMA - RIP V1 unicast instead of broadcast."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:09 GMT-3