From: boby2kusa@hotmail.com
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 13:47:59 GMT-3
huh? I think what you should do is default originate at R3 and configure
static route to the R4 as the gateway of last resort. that will announce
that to the rest of the OSPF routers that is has the route to the gateway.
No need for NAT.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cezar Fistik" <cfistik@moldovacc.md>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: Possible NAT?
> Hello Ray,
>
> Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:23:58 PM, you wrote:
>
> BR> R1----OSPF----R2----OSPF----R3----No routing protocol running----R4
>
> BR> Do not run a routing protocol between R3 and R4; however you
> BR> should be able to ping R4 from any other router on the network.
> BR> My thought was to redistribute the connected network between
> BR> R3 and R4 into ospf and then do a static nat between R3 and R4.
>
> NAT should work, you porbably missconfigured it.
>
> Here's another solution:
>
> The problem here is that packets arrive to R4, but R4 doesn't know
> where to send them, since no routing protocol is running and I assume
> static routes are not allowed as well.
>
> You could try to implement a route-map on R4 that will forward any
> locally originated ip packet to R3 and from there to the rest of the
> network.
>
> BTW, someone please tell me if a route map with a default next-hop is
> considered a static route or not? If yes then my solutin sucks.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Cezar mailto:cfistik@moldovacc.md
>
> ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:56 GMT-3