Re: Possible NAT?

From: Cezar Fistik (cfistik@moldovacc.md)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:51:21 GMT-3


Hello Ray,

Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:23:58 PM, you wrote:

BR> R1----OSPF----R2----OSPF----R3----No routing protocol running----R4

BR> Do not run a routing protocol between R3 and R4; however you
BR> should be able to ping R4 from any other router on the network.
BR> My thought was to redistribute the connected network between
BR> R3 and R4 into ospf and then do a static nat between R3 and R4.

NAT should work, you porbably missconfigured it.

Here's another solution:

The problem here is that packets arrive to R4, but R4 doesn't know
where to send them, since no routing protocol is running and I assume
static routes are not allowed as well.

You could try to implement a route-map on R4 that will forward any
locally originated ip packet to R3 and from there to the rest of the
network.

BTW, someone please tell me if a route map with a default next-hop is
considered a static route or not? If yes then my solutin sucks.

-- 
Best regards,
Cezar                            mailto:cfistik@moldovacc.md

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:56 GMT-3