From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 02 2003 - 19:24:54 GMT-3
Thanks.
--- christopher snow <cbsnow31@yahoo.com> wrote:
> There are several ways to do this.
>
> router rip
> distribute-list 1 in
> redis ospf 23 metric x
> !
> router ospf 23
> redis rip subnets metric x
> distribute-list 2 in
> !
> access-l 1 permit x.x.x.x (list rip originated
> routes)
> access-l 2 permit x.x.x.x (list ospf originated
> routes)
>
> This works fine if there is only one point of
> redistribution. If there are multiple points of
> redistribution then you can kill all redudancy with
> the above. With multiple points use something
> like..
>
> router rip
> distance 130
> distance 120 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 1
> redis ospf 23 metric x
> !
> router ospf 23
> distance 130
> distance 110 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 2
> redis rip subnets metric x
>
> !
> access-l 1 permit x.x.x.x (list rip originated
> routes)
> access-l 2 permit x.x.x.x (list ospf originated
> routes)
>
> I am sure others may do it different ways, but I
> choose this method unless the scenerio says I can't.
>
> Make sure you enter the distance commands before you
> enter the network statements to keep the router from
> learning routes via the normal AD.
>
> HTH...
>
> Chris Snow
>
> --- Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > What I suppose to do ?
> >
> > --- christopher snow <cbsnow31@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > There is not a problem with EIGRP and OSPF
> because
> > > EGIRP has two ADs for internal and external
> > routes.
> > > However, the rip routes from R1 will have issues
> > > when
> > > breing redistributed since the AD of OSPF &
> EIGRP
> > > are
> > > lower than RIP.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > > Chris Snow
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > A scenario:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > RIP OSPF EIGRP 1
> > > > R1----R2-------R3-------R5
> > > > |
> > > > R4
> > > > |EIGRP 2
> > > > R6
> > > >
> > > > RIP between R1 and R2.
> > > > OSPF among R2, R3, R4.
> > > > EIGRP 1 between R3 and R5.
> > > > EIGRP 2 between R4 and R6.
> > > >
> > > > I want to know in this case, there is no mult
> > > > redistribute point between any two of them.
> > > Should
> > > > I
> > > > filter the routes when redistributing if not
> > > asked?
> > > >
> > > > What's the implicit configuration in this
> case?
> > > >
> > > > Assume all links are frame-relay.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved
> product
> > > > search
> > > > http://shopping.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation:
> > > > Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:56 GMT-3