RE: Mutual redistribution.

From: Nawaz, Ajaz (Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com)
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 08:33:20 GMT-3

• Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: "frame-relay fragment" and packet size"
• Previous message: Christopher Edelsten: "CCIE bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: chipn@intraworx.net: "Mutual redistribution."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

watch out for mutual redistribution between multiple ospf processes - use
'distance' to avoid loops/blackholes in this scenario.
 
ajaz

-----Original Message-----
From: chipn@intraworx.net [mailto:chipn@intraworx.net]
Sent: 28 September 2003 02:27
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Mutual redistribution.

I'm looking for opinion on lab strategy.

If you encounter a mutual redistribution scenario with multiple
redistributions points on the lab, would it be in your best interest to
explictly control your routing information to prevent route feedback? It
is possible to have complete connectivity in this scenario without
filtering, but still have the potential for routing loops.

I thought this would be the best place to get some expert advice on the
subject.

Thanks.

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***

• Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: "frame-relay fragment" and packet size"
• Previous message: Christopher Edelsten: "CCIE bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: chipn@intraworx.net: "Mutual redistribution."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:39 GMT-3