Mutual redistribution.

From: chipn@intraworx.net
Date: Sat Sep 27 2003 - 22:27:02 GMT-3

• Next message: wsq: "pls add me to mail list again"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: CCIE:12304"
• Next in thread: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: christopher snow: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: A Paradela: "RE: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Arifur Rahman: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Mutual redistribution."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I'm looking for opinion on lab strategy.

If you encounter a mutual redistribution scenario with multiple
redistributions points on the lab, would it be in your best interest to
explictly control your routing information to prevent route feedback? It
is possible to have complete connectivity in this scenario without
filtering, but still have the potential for routing loops.

I thought this would be the best place to get some expert advice on the
subject.

Thanks.

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***

• Next message: wsq: "pls add me to mail list again"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: CCIE:12304"
• Next in thread: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: christopher snow: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: A Paradela: "RE: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Arifur Rahman: "Re: Mutual redistribution."
• Maybe reply: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Mutual redistribution."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:38 GMT-3