routes to backbones

From: Kaiser Anwar (kaiseranwar@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:48:41 GMT-3

Next message: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Previous message: William Lijewski: "Re: Any difference between dialer watch-disable and dialer"
Next in thread: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: William Lijewski: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Tony Schaffran: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Kaiser Anwar: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: William Lijewski: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: miken: "Re: routes to backbones"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,
    just came up with this, if I am told that I am not supposed to send any
routes to backbone.
    what would be the best way to accomplish this.create an standard access
list and apply to the bb interface or
   match it with distribute list and apply it in the routing process for rip
or for bgp on neighbor. just little confused.
  in either of the case if an access list is applied. would I still be able to
ping BB routes. or may there is a proper way to do it.

Thanks
Kaiser Anwar

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***

Next message: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Previous message: William Lijewski: "Re: Any difference between dialer watch-disable and dialer"
Next in thread: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Boyan Krosnov: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: William Lijewski: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Tony Schaffran: "RE: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: Kaiser Anwar: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: William Lijewski: "Re: routes to backbones"
Maybe reply: miken: "Re: routes to backbones"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:37 GMT-3