From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:09:06 GMT-3
I would interpret that to make the backbone interface passive.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
http://www.cconlinelabs.com/
Your #1 choice for online cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kaiser Anwar
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:49 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: routes to backbones
Hi,
just came up with this, if I am told that I am not supposed to send any
routes to backbone.
what would be the best way to accomplish this.create an standard access
list and apply to the bb interface or
match it with distribute list and apply it in the routing process for rip
or for bgp on neighbor. just little confused.
in either of the case if an access list is applied. would I still be able
to
ping BB routes. or may there is a proper way to do it.
Thanks
Kaiser Anwar
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:37 GMT-3