From: Deepesh Chouhan (deepesh@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 17:57:00 GMT-3
Hi
It looks like an honest mistake on Sameer's part. I didn't replied.
So no rules were broken and no violation took place.
I would also like to add that, its upto you to police yourself in not
breaking NDA.
It can only be enforced upto a certain extent.
I always belived that, i should be able to look at myself and say that i
deserved my CCIE.
So lets get back to studies :)
thanks
deepesh
ps: can i start a thread about ccie plaques :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Jonathan V Hays
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:12 PM
> To: 'Logan, Harold'; 'akbar khan'; i_sameer@hotmail.com;
> sanjay_wc@hotmail.com; deepesh@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Reminder of NDA -- Re: CCIE # 12046
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Your guidelines for handling NDAs on this list have some merit. And you
> are correct that drawing public attention to an NDA may not be the best
> idea.
>
> However, in this case it is worth pointing out that an NDA violation did
> not occur. Sameer himself did not violate the NDA but was apparently
> asking others to do so. Perhaps he simply was not aware of the existence
> of the NDA. There is so much legal boilerplate floating around that few
> of us bother to read it.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Logan, Harold
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:43 PM
> To: akbar khan; i_sameer@hotmail.com; sanjay_wc@hotmail.com;
> deepesh@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Reminder of NDA -- Re: CCIE # 12046
>
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a mod. It has always been my opinion though that
> the best response to suspected NDA violations on the list is to either:
>
> 1. Ignore it.
> 2. Report it to a moderator
> 3. Take it up with the suspected violator off-list.
>
> The absolute worst thing to do is to mention it on-list, because then
> you're drawing attention to the alleged violation.
>
> Having said that, the literary scholar that's capable of reading through
> ALL THAT STUFF below and finding a useful piece of NDA-violating
> material deserves whatever perceived edge they get on the next lab
> because of it. Anyone with the patience to read through all that
> deserves it.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> sameer inam
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:33 AM
> To: sanjay_wc@hotmail.com; deepesh@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE # 12046
>
>
> congrate for the clear the CCIE LAB ...i am also started the preparation
> of CCIE lab can u tell me wat type question there ...and wat type
> senorio
> ok
>
> i really thank full to you
>
> take care
>
> sameer
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:53 GMT-3