From: yu chunyan (yuchunyan@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:45:06 GMT-3
Hi,
you can define the cost in local peer statements in R5 and R6 to affect the
choice of peer in R8, or just point out cost corresponding R5 and R6 in
remote peer statements in R8 to accomplish same goal without configure
change in R5 R6.
Bin.
>From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
>Reply-To: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
>To: "Micah Byers" <micah@myvine.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: dlsw cost
>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:41:19 +0800
>
>Hi Micah Byers,
>
>Thanks, in transparent environment, if R8 has two peer to reach the same
>destination, can I use "cost" to choose the peer, or it cannot be achieved
>in transparent bridge environment as looping?
>
>i.e. R8---------------------------------R6--| R6 and R5 are in same
>segment which can reach the same destination in R8's view of point.
> |___________________R5--|
>
>Thx,
>BBD (Big Black Dog)
>
>
>
>
>
> "Micah Byers"
> <micah@myvine.com To:
><wing_lam@jossynergy.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re: dlsw cost
> nobody@groupstudy
> .com
>
>
> 07/29/2003 10:24
> PM
> Please respond to
> "Micah Byers"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The DLSW capabilities command shows you what capabilities your DLSW peers
>have, in other words it is what your peers are sending to you. When you
>issue that command on R8 it will show you what R6 is sending to you for
>it's
>capabilities, this is why it shows up when you change the cost for R6 with
>the DLSW local-peer command on R6. IOS still uses the cost that you assign
>to that remote peer, even if it doesn't show up in the "show capabilities"
>command.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <wing_lam@jossynergy.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:08 AM
>Subject: dlsw cost
>
>
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I have the following scenario, both end are ethernet with bridge-group 9
> > configured:
> >
> > R6--------------------R8
> > 172.16.1.6 172.16.1.8
> >
> > I config R8 Dlsw with the following:
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.1.8
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.16.1.6 cost 5
> > dlsw bridge-group 9
> >
> > The peer can establish successfully, but no matter how I change the
>cost,
> > "show dlsw cap" still shows a 3.
> >
> > R8#sh dlsw cap
> > DLSw: Capabilities for peer 172.16.1.6(2065)
> > .................
> > peer group number : 0
> > peer cluster support : no
> > border peer capable : no
> > peer cost : 3
> > biu-segment configured : no
> > UDP Unicast support : yes
> > ...................
> >
> > But I can change the cost vlaue show in R8 if I change the local peer in
>R6
> > (i.e. dlsw local peer 172.16.1.6 cost 4".
> >
> > Any hints? am I wrong in concept of dlsw cost in remote peer statement?
> >
> > Thx,
> > BBD (Big Black Dog)
> > DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use
>of
> > the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
> > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> > any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
> > immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original
>message.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:57 GMT-3