From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 11:41:19 GMT-3
Hi Micah Byers,
Thanks, in transparent environment, if R8 has two peer to reach the same
destination, can I use "cost" to choose the peer, or it cannot be achieved
in transparent bridge environment as looping?
i.e. R8---------------------------------R6--| R6 and R5 are in same
segment which can reach the same destination in R8's view of point.
|___________________R5--|
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
"Micah Byers"
<micah@myvine.com To: <wing_lam@jossynergy.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: dlsw cost
nobody@groupstudy
.com
07/29/2003 10:24
PM
Please respond to
"Micah Byers"
The DLSW capabilities command shows you what capabilities your DLSW peers
have, in other words it is what your peers are sending to you. When you
issue that command on R8 it will show you what R6 is sending to you for
it's
capabilities, this is why it shows up when you change the cost for R6 with
the DLSW local-peer command on R6. IOS still uses the cost that you assign
to that remote peer, even if it doesn't show up in the "show capabilities"
command.
----- Original Message -----
From: <wing_lam@jossynergy.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:08 AM
Subject: dlsw cost
> Hi group,
>
> I have the following scenario, both end are ethernet with bridge-group 9
> configured:
>
> R6--------------------R8
> 172.16.1.6 172.16.1.8
>
> I config R8 Dlsw with the following:
>
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.1.8
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.16.1.6 cost 5
> dlsw bridge-group 9
>
> The peer can establish successfully, but no matter how I change the cost,
> "show dlsw cap" still shows a 3.
>
> R8#sh dlsw cap
> DLSw: Capabilities for peer 172.16.1.6(2065)
> .................
> peer group number : 0
> peer cluster support : no
> border peer capable : no
> peer cost : 3
> biu-segment configured : no
> UDP Unicast support : yes
> ...................
>
> But I can change the cost vlaue show in R8 if I change the local peer in
R6
> (i.e. dlsw local peer 172.16.1.6 cost 4".
>
> Any hints? am I wrong in concept of dlsw cost in remote peer statement?
>
> Thx,
> BBD (Big Black Dog)
> DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
> immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original
message.
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:57 GMT-3