From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 21:19:09 GMT-3
Hello ccie2be,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 4:47:24 PM, you wrote:
c> Hi,
c> Thanks for getting back to me. With the way I'm set up, I'm not sure how I
c> can get a host there but I'm not concerned about that. I'll figure something
c> out.
c> I'm more concerned about whether or not I need the "router mobile" command.
c> I thought that was used only for IP Mobile not Local Area Mobile. Also, can
c> you verify if the bridge x protocol ieee and bridge-group commands are
c> needed. Thanks, Raj
c> ----- Original Message -----
c> From: "asadovnikov" <asadovnikov@comcast.net>
c> To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'Group Study'"
c> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
c> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:29 PM
c> Subject: RE: Local-Area Mobility
>> You actually need to put a host there for the mobile route to show up.
c> You
>> can use another router as a host, just ping some place from it and the
>> router will install as he arp for it's default gateway.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexei
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>> ccie2be
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:08 PM
>> To: Group Study
>> Subject: Local-Area Mobility
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This seemingly easy topic has me going crazy.
>>
>> Here's what I trying to do.
>>
>> I want users whose PC's are configured with addresses from the 10.1.7.0/24
>> subnet to be able to attach to subnet 172.16.136.0/26 without needed to
>> change
>> their ip addr or default gateway.
>>
>> This is what I did:
>>
>> R6
>>
>> int e0
>> ip addr 172.16.136.6 255.255.255.192
>> ip mobile arp access-group 1
>>
>>
>> router eigrp 1
>> redistribute mobile metric 128 1000 255 1 1500
>> net 172.16.136.0 0.0.0.63
>> no auto-summary
>>
>> access-list 1 permit 10.1.7.0 0.0.0.255
>>
>>
>> In the solution (IPexpert - e-scenario 329), the routing table shows an
>> entry
>> for the 10.1.7.0 subnet which looks like this:
>>
>> M 10.1.7.1/32 [3/1] via 10.1.7.1, 00:02:03, Ethernet0
>>
>> My config is identical except that I don't have the command "router
c> mobile"
>> which I understand isn't needed. ( I tried using that command just the
c> same,
>> but it didn't seem to do anything in any case. I also tried using the
>> bridge
>> 1 protocol ieee and bridge-group 1 command but that didn't seem to work
>> either.)
>>
>> Can somebody help me understand why 10.1.7.0 isn't showing up in the route
>> table and what I should do about it? This would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Raj
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
c> _______________________________________________________________________
c> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
c> Subscription information may be found at:
c> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Hi, I just set this up and it works great without the use of the
"router mobile" command. The bridge is not needed.
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:56 GMT-3