From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 21:11:39 GMT-3
The Doc CD seems to indicate bridging is used when you have a single
router Local Area Mobility solution. See
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfipadr.htm#1001249
Also, this is a pretty good LAM whitepaper:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/lamso_wp.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:47 PM
To: Group Study; asadovnikov@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Local-Area Mobility
Hi,
Thanks for getting back to me. With the way I'm set up, I'm not sure
how I
can get a host there but I'm not concerned about that. I'll figure
something
out.
I'm more concerned about whether or not I need the "router mobile"
command.
I thought that was used only for IP Mobile not Local Area Mobile. Also,
can
you verify if the bridge x protocol ieee and bridge-group commands are
needed. Thanks, Raj
----- Original Message -----
From: "asadovnikov" <asadovnikov@comcast.net>
To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'Group Study'"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: Local-Area Mobility
> You actually need to put a host there for the mobile route to show up.
You
> can use another router as a host, just ping some place from it and the
> router will install as he arp for it's default gateway.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:08 PM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Local-Area Mobility
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This seemingly easy topic has me going crazy.
>
> Here's what I trying to do.
>
> I want users whose PC's are configured with addresses from the
10.1.7.0/24
> subnet to be able to attach to subnet 172.16.136.0/26 without needed
to
> change
> their ip addr or default gateway.
>
> This is what I did:
>
> R6
>
> int e0
> ip addr 172.16.136.6 255.255.255.192
> ip mobile arp access-group 1
>
>
> router eigrp 1
> redistribute mobile metric 128 1000 255 1 1500
> net 172.16.136.0 0.0.0.63
> no auto-summary
>
> access-list 1 permit 10.1.7.0 0.0.0.255
>
>
> In the solution (IPexpert - e-scenario 329), the routing table shows
an
> entry
> for the 10.1.7.0 subnet which looks like this:
>
> M 10.1.7.1/32 [3/1] via 10.1.7.1, 00:02:03, Ethernet0
>
> My config is identical except that I don't have the command "router
mobile"
> which I understand isn't needed. ( I tried using that command just the
same,
> but it didn't seem to do anything in any case. I also tried using the
> bridge
> 1 protocol ieee and bridge-group 1 command but that didn't seem to
work
> either.)
>
> Can somebody help me understand why 10.1.7.0 isn't showing up in the
route
> table and what I should do about it? This would be greatly
appreciated.
>
> Raj
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:56 GMT-3