From: yu chunyan (yuchunyan@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 21:37:20 GMT-3
Hi,
I just practice the local mobile a few days ago. I think if you just mobile
within same router, you donot need route mobile. But if you mobile between
several routers, you need "router mobile" and redist it to the IGP so that
others know the host route(/32). The host route show up only when a mobiling
pc attached the router(only host route, not subnet). In my lab, I find I
need bridge-group to make it work, even ip is routed here(not bridge). I
donot know why.
Bin Lei
>From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
>Reply-To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
>To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, <asadovnikov@comcast.net>
>Subject: Re: Local-Area Mobility
>Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:47:24 -0400
>
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for getting back to me. With the way I'm set up, I'm not sure how I
>can get a host there but I'm not concerned about that. I'll figure
>something
>out.
>
>I'm more concerned about whether or not I need the "router mobile" command.
>I thought that was used only for IP Mobile not Local Area Mobile. Also,
>can
>you verify if the bridge x protocol ieee and bridge-group commands are
>needed. Thanks, Raj
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "asadovnikov" <asadovnikov@comcast.net>
>To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'Group Study'"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:29 PM
>Subject: RE: Local-Area Mobility
>
>
> > You actually need to put a host there for the mobile route to show up.
>You
> > can use another router as a host, just ping some place from it and the
> > router will install as he arp for it's default gateway.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexei
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > ccie2be
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:08 PM
> > To: Group Study
> > Subject: Local-Area Mobility
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This seemingly easy topic has me going crazy.
> >
> > Here's what I trying to do.
> >
> > I want users whose PC's are configured with addresses from the
>10.1.7.0/24
> > subnet to be able to attach to subnet 172.16.136.0/26 without needed to
> > change
> > their ip addr or default gateway.
> >
> > This is what I did:
> >
> > R6
> >
> > int e0
> > ip addr 172.16.136.6 255.255.255.192
> > ip mobile arp access-group 1
> >
> >
> > router eigrp 1
> > redistribute mobile metric 128 1000 255 1 1500
> > net 172.16.136.0 0.0.0.63
> > no auto-summary
> >
> > access-list 1 permit 10.1.7.0 0.0.0.255
> >
> >
> > In the solution (IPexpert - e-scenario 329), the routing table shows an
> > entry
> > for the 10.1.7.0 subnet which looks like this:
> >
> > M 10.1.7.1/32 [3/1] via 10.1.7.1, 00:02:03, Ethernet0
> >
> > My config is identical except that I don't have the command "router
>mobile"
> > which I understand isn't needed. ( I tried using that command just the
>same,
> > but it didn't seem to do anything in any case. I also tried using the
> > bridge
> > 1 protocol ieee and bridge-group 1 command but that didn't seem to work
> > either.)
> >
> > Can somebody help me understand why 10.1.7.0 isn't showing up in the
>route
> > table and what I should do about it? This would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Raj
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:56 GMT-3