RE: OSPF with secondary IP's

From: Snow, Tim (timothy.snow@eds.com)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 01:23:01 GMT-3

• Next message: Mike Williams: "Difference between these two access-lists"
• Previous message: folivore: "Re: VoIP dial-peer question"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Next in thread: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Negative, you'll get errors due to the fact that the router will source the
OSPF hellos (assuming you put the primary into a OSPF area) from the primary
interfaces. Much the same way you'll see "not on common subnet" errors with
EIGRP.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com [mailto:Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF with secondary IP's

Hello, Group.
 
R1------R2
 
R1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
 
R2
ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
 
Both networks are under OSPF in the same area. Will the two routers become
adjacent?
 
Thanks,
Danny
 

Danny Andaluz, CCNP
Network Engineer
Triaton, North America
908-541-6522

• Next message: Mike Williams: "Difference between these two access-lists"
• Previous message: folivore: "Re: VoIP dial-peer question"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Next in thread: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:52 GMT-3