RE: OSPF with secondary IP's

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 10:26:49 GMT-3

• Next message: Pita40: "Multicast Auto RP"
• Previous message: Mike Williams: "RE: 4506 on 12.1(12c)EW - mgmt interface ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Next in thread: ¼B³Õ¤¯: "RE: OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks for all the responses, guys. I tried this in my lab and what I found is that they will become neighbors but no routes are learned.

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: Snow, Tim [mailto:timothy.snow@eds.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:23 AM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: OSPF with secondary IP's

Negative, you'll get errors due to the fact that the router will source the OSPF hellos (assuming you put the primary into a OSPF area) from the primary interfaces. Much the same way you'll see "not on common subnet" errors with EIGRP.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com [mailto:Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF with secondary IP's

Hello, Group.
 
R1------R2
 
R1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
 
R2
ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
 
Both networks are under OSPF in the same area. Will the two routers become adjacent?
 
Thanks,
Danny
 

Danny Andaluz, CCNP
Network Engineer
Triaton, North America
908-541-6522

• Next message: Pita40: "Multicast Auto RP"
• Previous message: Mike Williams: "RE: 4506 on 12.1(12c)EW - mgmt interface ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Next in thread: ¼B³Õ¤¯: "RE: OSPF with secondary IP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:52 GMT-3