Class_based Qing Again.....?

From: neil K (neil_k11@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat May 17 2003 - 00:42:26 GMT-3


All,

After seraching the archives, this is what I got fot Custom Queue to CBWFQ
conversion example.
Assuming that we have the Custom Q given with Queue for Telnet, FTP and Dlsw
and respective Byte-Count, I come up with these numbers for BW-percent.
But, the question still I have is, should we use max-reserved bandwidth 100 or
not .........or should we go with 75% and leave rest for other layer two
traffic. Also what happens if the Telnet or any other traffic is put in CQ
queue "0" which is the system queue in CQ.

WILL APPRECIATE YOUR HELP.

Here is the config, I got for conversion...........
!
!
!
class-map TELNET
  match access-group 144
class-map DLSW
  match protocol dlsw
class-map FTP
  match access-group 145
!
!
policy-map POL1
  class TELNET
   bandwidth percent 40
   queue-limit 100
  class FTP
   bandwidth percent 20
   queue-limit 200
  class DLSW
   bandwidth percent 20
   queue-limit 100
  class class-default
   bandwidth percent 20
!
!
access-list 144 permit tcp any any eq telnet
access-list 145 permit tcp any any eq ftp
!
!
interface Serial0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
 service-policy output POL1

Thanks,

neil



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:48 GMT-3