From: Daniel Free (danrose111@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 03:35:50 GMT-3
Hi,
I'm not sure about the OSPF handling question
but I do think unless it is a cut and paste error
that your access-list will do nothing because your
dialer-list command is wrong:
>access-list 1 permit 172.16.230.0 0.0.0.255
>dialer-list 1 permit ip protocol
Should be:
dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1
Danny
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emad" <emad@zakq8.com>
To: "Brian Dennis" <brian@labforge.com>; "CCIE LAB (E-mail)"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 12:23 AM
Subject: RE: OSPF handling
> The solution just talked about that and I wanted to share it with u
although I didn't hear about before
>
> Anyway , it seems some misunderstanding for keywords
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Dennis [mailto:brian@labforge.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 11:27 PM
> To: Emad; 'CCIE LAB (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: OSPF handling
>
> What does it have to do with any special handling with OSPF and PPP?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Emad
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: Brian Dennis; CCIE LAB (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: OSPF handling
>
> The requirement is to make this subnet as the interesting traffic for
> the BRI interface, which has PPP encapsulation of course
>
> Yes I meant binding the Acl to the dialer-list
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Dennis [mailto:brian@labforge.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: Emad; 'CCIE LAB (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: OSPF handling
>
> What are the requirements for the task? Also did you mean to bind the
> ACL to the dialer-list?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Emad
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 9:07 AM
> To: CCIE LAB (E-mail)
> Subject: OSPF handling
>
> Dear folks,
> Is there a special treatment that ospf does with traffic of IPs range
> encapsulated into PPP , as example:
>
> Interface BRI 0/0
> Ip add 172.16.230.0 255.255.255.0
>
> Dialer-group 1
> !
>
> access-list 1 permit 172.16.230.0 0.0.0.255
> dialer-list 1 permit ip protocol
>
> The solution stated that we should use Wild card with this range instead
> of writing the network only because of OSPF special treatment to PPP
> encapsulated traffic
>
> Thanx in advance
> s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:48 GMT-3