From: huang gang (bgv@ggv.com.cn)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 22:15:43 GMT-3
hi,Kasturi:
when you use network statement in link state protocol such as ospf, you should exactly point out the interface you want ospf to run .in this way ,redistribute connnected is not needed!
best regards!
huangg
email: bgv@ggv.com.cn
Tel: (86)010-62984668-3912
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jung, Jin" <jin.jung@lmco.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:55 AM
Subject: RE: mutually redistributes rip & ospf
> Yes you have to manually redis between RIP and OSPF,
> Just rememner for RIP, if NetB is part of classful boundry of network
> command,
> Example, netb = 10.10.10.5 255.255.255.0 and neta = 10.20.30.40
> 255.255.255.0
> If you do
> Rotuer rip
> Net 10.0.0.0
> All the class A 10.0.0.0 will be part of network statement.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kasturi cisco [mailto:kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 10:22 AM
> To: cchorao@xtra.co.nz; rich@myhomemail.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: mutually redistributes rip & ospf
>
>
> The way i understand it is this only applies to DV protocols and not link
> state protocols like OSPF and ISIS.For these we have to manually
> resditribute the connected networks.
>
> Correct me if needed.
>
> Good Luck,[IMAGE]
> Kasturi.
>
> >From: "Carlos" >Reply-To: "Carlos" >To: "'Richard Davidson'" ,
> "'groupstudy'" >Subject: RE: mutually redistributes rip & ospf >Date: Tue, 6
> May 2003 21:45:59 +1200 > >Richard, > > the redis command takes routes out
> of the routing table that belong to >the redistributed protocol as well as
> connected interfaces that the >redistributed protocol has a network
> statement for . > > >carlos >#11351 > > > >-----Original
> Message----- >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of >Richard Davidson >Sent: 06 May 2003 13:20 >To: groupstudy
> >Subject: mutually redistributes rip & ospf > > >See diagram bellow.
> >When
> R2 mutually redistributes >rip to ospf and ospf to rip how does r1 know
> about >netB connected to R2. Only rip routes were >redistributed into ospf,
> not connected. I am assuming >that the redistribution command is only taking
> routes >out of the routing table that are rip or ospf
> >respectively. In which case netB was not a rip route, >since it is
> connected to R2. When I look in r1's >routing table it has the route to
> netB. How does R1 >have the route to netB? >Thanks >Rich Davidson > <-rip
> >R1----netA---R2---netB---R3 > ospf->
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It's spooky. It's a thriller. See Bhoot slideshow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:38 GMT-3