From: Richard Davidson (rich@myhomemail.net)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 22:20:00 GMT-3
See diagram bellow. When R2 mutually redistributes
rip to ospf and ospf to rip how does r1 know about
netB connected to R2. Only rip routes were
redistributed into ospf, not connected. I am assuming
that the redistribution command is only taking routes
out of the routing table that are rip or ospf
respectively. In which case netB was not a rip route,
since it is connected to R2. When I look in r1's
routing table it has the route to netB. How does R1
have the route to netB?
Thanks
Rich Davidson
<-rip
R1----netA---R2---netB---R3
ospf->
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:37 GMT-3