Re: Nat - to pool or not to pool...

From: Ram Shummoogum (rshummoo@ca.ibm.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 16:54:28 GMT-3


The differrence is the number of config lines.
I have posted this issue in IPexpert forum a few weeks ago and the answer I
got was that there is no diff.

In the exams I would go with the interface option.

cheers,
RAM

"Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>@groupstudy.com on 05/02/2003 02:13:02 PM

Please respond to "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>

Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com

To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: Nat - to pool or not to pool...

Just a little curious as to the NAT solution for Lab 19 IPE:

S0/0 ip add 150.50.5.69/27

The solution is listed as:
ip nat pool backbone2 150.50.5.69 150.50.5.69 netmask 255.255.255.224
ip nat inside source list 2 pool backbone2 overload
!
access-list 2 permit 150.50.4.0 0.0.0.255

I just did this:
ip nat inside source list 80 interface Serial0/0 overload
!
access-list 80 permit 150.50.4.0 0.0.0.255

I don't think there is any difference is there?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:36 GMT-3