RE: CBWFQ question

From: Ouellette, Tim (tim.ouellette@eds.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 01:31:06 GMT-3

• Next message: Ouellette, Tim: "RE: Reflexive ACL - what am I missing? Can't ping!!"
• Previous message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: WAY OT: Smoking during the lab?"
• Maybe in reply to: folivore: "CBWFQ question"
• Next in thread: folivore: "Re: CBWFQ question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Did you mean something like this

interface Serial1
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay class servicepolicy
 frame-relay traffic-shaping

map-class frame-relay servicepolicy
 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
 service-policy output test

policy-map test
  class voice
    priority 128
  class data
   bandwidth 64

class-map match-all data
  match ip precedence 3
class-map match-all voice
  match ip precedence 5

Hope that helps.....

You can also apply the service-policy directly to the interface if you want
to avoid usine the map-classes and frame-relay class's

Cheers

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: folivore [mailto:folivore@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:54 PM
To: CCIELab@Groupstudy.com
Subject: CBWFQ question

Hi, Group:
I know we can apply CBWFQ on VC - level and enable FRTS on the physical
interface, can we just apply a CBWFQ or LLQ directly to the physical FR
interface? Cisco's document is not very clear on it.

Thanks a lot

Jim

• Next message: Ouellette, Tim: "RE: Reflexive ACL - what am I missing? Can't ping!!"
• Previous message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: WAY OT: Smoking during the lab?"
• Maybe in reply to: folivore: "CBWFQ question"
• Next in thread: folivore: "Re: CBWFQ question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:35 GMT-3