Re: CBWFQ question

From: folivore (folivore@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 05:00:57 GMT-3


Do you need to enable FRTS if you apply it directly to the interface?
Also if you use class, how can you check out if it's used on the interface?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
To: "'folivore'" <folivore@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: CBWFQ question

> Did you mean something like this
>
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay class servicepolicy
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
>
> map-class frame-relay servicepolicy
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> service-policy output test
>
> policy-map test
> class voice
> priority 128
> class data
> bandwidth 64
>
> class-map match-all data
> match ip precedence 3
> class-map match-all voice
> match ip precedence 5
>
>
> Hope that helps.....
>
> You can also apply the service-policy directly to the interface if you
want
> to avoid usine the map-classes and frame-relay class's
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: folivore [mailto:folivore@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: CCIELab@Groupstudy.com
> Subject: CBWFQ question
>
>
> Hi, Group:
> I know we can apply CBWFQ on VC - level and enable FRTS on the physical
> interface, can we just apply a CBWFQ or LLQ directly to the physical FR
> interface? Cisco's document is not very clear on it.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Jim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:35 GMT-3