From: Ouellette, Tim (tim.ouellette@eds.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 05:03:23 GMT-3
I believe that you need to enable to do CBWFQ with a strict priority queue.
-----Original Message-----
From: folivore [mailto:folivore@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 4:01 AM
To: Ouellette, Tim
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CBWFQ question
Do you need to enable FRTS if you apply it directly to the interface?
Also if you use class, how can you check out if it's used on the interface?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
To: "'folivore'" <folivore@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: CBWFQ question
> Did you mean something like this
>
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay class servicepolicy
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
>
> map-class frame-relay servicepolicy
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> service-policy output test
>
> policy-map test
> class voice
> priority 128
> class data
> bandwidth 64
>
> class-map match-all data
> match ip precedence 3
> class-map match-all voice
> match ip precedence 5
>
>
> Hope that helps.....
>
> You can also apply the service-policy directly to the interface if you
want
> to avoid usine the map-classes and frame-relay class's
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: folivore [mailto:folivore@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: CCIELab@Groupstudy.com
> Subject: CBWFQ question
>
>
> Hi, Group:
> I know we can apply CBWFQ on VC - level and enable FRTS on the physical
> interface, can we just apply a CBWFQ or LLQ directly to the physical FR
> interface? Cisco's document is not very clear on it.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:35 GMT-3