From: Alan Benjamin (abenjami@cisco.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 08:02:57 GMT-3
This URL may help to answer some of your questions:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/cbwfq_frpvs.html
Note the following excerpt in particular:
>Note: If you enable a service policy directly on a main interface and not
>within a map-class command, you also cannot apply Frame Relay TS directly
>to the interface. It is important to note that the queueing mechanisms
>then apply to a single large interface queue rather than to per-Virtual
>Circuit (VC) queues.
I hope this helps.
Take care,
Alan
At 03:00 AM 5/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Do you need to enable FRTS if you apply it directly to the interface?
>Also if you use class, how can you check out if it's used on the interface?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
>To: "'folivore'" <folivore@hotmail.com>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 11:31 PM
>Subject: RE: CBWFQ question
>
>
> > Did you mean something like this
> >
> > interface Serial1
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay class servicepolicy
> > frame-relay traffic-shaping
> >
> > map-class frame-relay servicepolicy
> > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> > service-policy output test
> >
> > policy-map test
> > class voice
> > priority 128
> > class data
> > bandwidth 64
> >
> > class-map match-all data
> > match ip precedence 3
> > class-map match-all voice
> > match ip precedence 5
> >
> >
> > Hope that helps.....
> >
> > You can also apply the service-policy directly to the interface if you
>want
> > to avoid usine the map-classes and frame-relay class's
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: folivore [mailto:folivore@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:54 PM
> > To: CCIELab@Groupstudy.com
> > Subject: CBWFQ question
> >
> >
> > Hi, Group:
> > I know we can apply CBWFQ on VC - level and enable FRTS on the physical
> > interface, can we just apply a CBWFQ or LLQ directly to the physical FR
> > interface? Cisco's document is not very clear on it.
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> >
> > Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:35 GMT-3