RE: ip accounting-trasits

From: 劉博仁 (johnson_liu@corp.giga.net.tw)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2003 - 23:05:25 GMT-3

Next message: Jay Hennigan: "RE: Verifying BGP MED when we don't have access to an AS"
Previous message: 劉博仁: "RE: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements necessary on which"
Maybe in reply to: midaskim: "ip accounting-trasits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I am agree with cannonor's comment.
According to you question, you should use 'ip accounting-threshold 300' to replace "ip accounting-trasits 300" command to archive your request.

--
Johnson Liu
Gigamedia, Inc.
Senoir Network Engineer
CCNP/CCDP/CCIE#11440
-----Original Message-----
From: cannonr [mailto:cannonr@attbi.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 12:19 AM
To: midaskim; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ip accounting-trasits
From Cisco...
Usage Guidelines
Transit entries are those that do not match any of the filters specified by ip accounting-list global configuration commands. If no filters are defined, no transit entries are possible.
.... You need to define an ip accounting-list before you can use the accounting-transits command.
HTH
----- Original Message -----
From: "midaskim" <janggulove@hanmail.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: ip accounting-trasits
> I'm working about "ip accounting-trasits".
>
> --s0.1<R5>s0.2-----<R6>
>
> In this topology,
>
> I'm testing that R5 will record the amount of traffic through R5 to 
> R6.
>
> It is supporting up to 300 records.
>
> I configured "ip accounting-trasits 300" in global cofiguration mode, 
> and "ip accounting out-packets" in S0.2 interface configuration mode.
>
> But. After configuring, there is no "ip accounting-trasits 300" in 
> running-configuration.
>
> What is my mistake ??
>
> My configuration is right about testing ????
>
> <My config>
>
> r5(config)#ip accounting-transits 300
> r5(config)#int s0.2
> r5(config-subif)#ip accounting output-packets r5(config-subif)#
> r5#sh ru
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 864 bytes
> !
> version 12.1
> no service single-slot-reload-enable
> service timestamps debug uptime
> service timestamps log uptime
> no service password-encryption
> !
> hostname r5
> !
> logging rate-limit console 10 except errors
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip finger
> !
> cns event-service server
> !
> interface Ethernet0
>  ip address 10.1.5.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0
>  no ip address
>  encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0.1 multipoint
>  ip address 10.1.35.2 255.255.255.0
>  frame-relay map ip 10.1.35.1 153 broadcast
> !
> interface Serial0.2 multipoint
>  ip address 10.1.56.1 255.255.255.0
>  ip accounting output-packets
>  frame-relay map ip 10.1.56.2 156 broadcast
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> midaskim
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> "?l8. @NEM3], Daum" http://www.daum.net  !:Fr;}>24B 9+7a GQ8^@O3]!;
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> GA8.9L>v 8^@O =a:8<L>n?d?
> 60!Av =:E2+?k7.H.@e+%a 3*88@G 8BCc 8^@O!
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> GQ8^@O3] =:FTA&7N =C=:E[
> =:FT >x4B FmAvGT! GQ8^@O3] FmAvGT!
>
> [IMAGE]

Next message: Jay Hennigan: "RE: Verifying BGP MED when we don't have access to an AS"
Previous message: 劉博仁: "RE: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements necessary on which"
Maybe in reply to: midaskim: "ip accounting-trasits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:59 GMT-3