Re: summary-only

From: D. J. Jones (meganac@attbi.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 2003 - 16:21:05 GMT-3

• Next message: cannonr@attbi.com: "Re: OT: 6509 or 7200, which is better for border router?"
• Previous message: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "Question on FRTS"
• Maybe in reply to: Pita40: "summary-only"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Your summary encompasses the address range 172.16.0.1 thru 172.16.255.254.
You only
need to summarize with two statements:

aggregate-address 172.16.101.0 255.255.255.0 summary-only
aggregate-address 172.16.102.0 255.255.254.0 summary-only

..dj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pita40" <pita40@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: summary-only

> I have one of the commercial lab and they asked to configure an aggregate
for
> 172.16.101.0, 172.16.102.0, 172.16.103.0.
>
> I did it using
>
> aggregate-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 summary-only
>
> Is there another way to solve this problem without creating routes to
null0

• Next message: cannonr@attbi.com: "Re: OT: 6509 or 7200, which is better for border router?"
• Previous message: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "Question on FRTS"
• Maybe in reply to: Pita40: "summary-only"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:56 GMT-3